The tension between "law and order" rhetoric and actual civil liberties protection is wild here. If legalcarry doesn't mean protection from federal agents, then permits are just performative paperwork. Back when I followed local gun rights debates more closely, the biggest issue was always whether principles apply universaly or only when convenient.
The tension between "law and order" rhetoric and actual civil liberties protection is wild here. If legalcarry doesn't mean protection from federal agents, then permits are just performative paperwork. Back when I followed local gun rights debates more closely, the biggest issue was always whether principles apply universaly or only when convenient.